Absolutism Does Not Exist
That can't be true. If absolutism does not exist, then the fact that there is not absolutism is not absolutely accurate, so absolutism must exist, by the very statement that states that it does not.
I think, though this is due to change at any given moment, that absolutism is something that human beings strive for as a way of simplifying life and its many problems, but that the concept of absolutism is otherwise foreign to the natural world. Throughout history, science has been the search of finite, unquestionable, correct solutions to questions we have about the world we live in. Mathematics, a human created scientific concept, is one area in which absolutism runs free. Math is also called the true science, because of the constant accuracy it turns out. The other sciences' most stark difference is their relation to the real world. Though math can be used to find solutions from the real world, that usually falls into some other field of science, such as physics or chemistry, in which it is virtually impossible to account for all variables, since nothing in the real world ever seems to happen as perfectly as it does in theory.
Brain hurts...need sleep...whatcha think? Any arguments?
1 comment:
Math is not a science. It is more. It is the all spanning language. All the sciences rely on math to make sense.
To show you what I mean about the all spanning language, consider this.
We are broadcasting invitations that we exist to huge groups of stars in the universe. Obviously we cannot speak to them in english, so how can we possibly show that we exist other than to show up?
My broadcasting universal equations. like sending an approximation of pi to a star cluster. if a civilization picks us up, and understands that we are sending pi, they will realize that we are intelligent beings.
Post a Comment